Greetings,
"The Global Forum of Japan (GFJ) E-Letter" is delivered electronically bimonthly, free of charge, to the readers in the world interested in Japanese thinking on the relations of Japan with the rest of the world and other related international affairs by the Global Forum of Japan (GFJ), a private membership organization in Japan for policy-oriented international exchanges.
It will provide the global audience with our news on "GFJ Commentary" and "GFJ Updates."
If you wish to unsubscribe, please enter your email address in the "unsubscribe" box at the following link:
http://www.gfj.jp/e/e-letter.htm
"GFJ Commentary"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"GFJ Commentary" presents views of members and/or friends of GFJ on the relations of Japan with the rest of the world and/or other related international affairs. The view expressed herein is the author's own and should not be attributed to GFJ.
an overseas business owner
Annoying neighbors are always stressful. They may trespass my own property, stare at my garden as if to carry out covert surveillance or they may even exude unsavory odor or display some hazardous materials, etc. Anything they do could be conducive to a mounting sense of frustration. These daily squabbles between neighbors, however, can easily settled by appealing to court, police or relevant public authorities, or you can simply move out. But in the case of cross-strait relations between Japan and South Korea, the two governments seem to be mired in utter communication failure: they generate a chain reaction of negativity through outright denial of each other's statements.
Despite an hour long meeting of Foreign Ministers, Mr. Kono of Japan and Ms. Kang Kyung-wha of Korea, held the other day after a while in Davos, Switzerland, it looked like both sides ended up only expressing what they wanted say. Which means, there was no solution found to improve the relations of the two countries. When it comes to the leaders of both countries, meeting of Prime Minister Abe and President Moon does not seem like a good idea now.While both are looking other directions, forcibly making them look the same way will 'break their neck.'
By looking back, the argument of Japan and Korea have always been different on, for example, issues of comfort women, forced-labor during the war, or various historical facts, and their gap has only kept getting wider. When I make a business deal with Korean people, they tend to say positively that they will do this and that. But when I ask them after some time to see what happened to those proposals, they would say "I don't know," or other person comes in and say that the previous person might have said so, but that's no longer acceptable. Such rule change without consultation sometimes occur.
So, what to do with Japan-Korea relations? We have thought in many ways, and I have written in many ways. I have explored the history, and have done business with Korean people. What I can say now is, after all, there is ups and downs between our relationship; most of the time it is cloudy, and sunshine sometimes sheds light between the clouds which is the good time. As such, they as sovereign nations shall keep their distance from each other, and deal with each other calmly and solemnly. The economic, cultural or social cooperation by the government shall be limited to ones necessary. Japan-Korea relations is regarded as the most crucial one for the regional security, but it is possible that such landscape would be overturned depending on how the diplomatic issue of North Korea would be developed.
Some Japanese private businesses which have expanded their business in Korea wish the bilateral relations be strengthened, though the business can be strengthened case by case. The Japan-Korea relations need to be squared at one point, then the remaining issues shall be solved through, for example, with a framework that involves a third party and dealt with through logics and international standard, not just to express one's opinion, no matter how long it would take. Regarding the case of Korean navy vessel allegedly directing the fire-control radar at Japan's maritime patrol aircraft, it is hard to judge this case, because there was no actual casualty and property damages caused. This event got a lot of attention, because it was on the news. However, the media should realize it was not a matter that ordinary people shall comment something on. Sorry to say but would anyone other than the expert have understood the "sound" from the aircraft communication made public?
In the contemporary society where the globalization is ongoing but the court system is not well-functioning for the case of the international disputes, the globalization has a serious deficiency: there is no means to troubleshoot, while the narrative is positively exaggerated. While maintaining the inter-governments' routine meetings or dialogues, the Japan-Korea relations shall be limited case by case, as well-said cliche goes "don't fix it if it ain't broke." There should be something private business can help improve the situation, as was the case before with the popularity on Korean dramas, e.g. "Winter Sonata," or K-Pops. In such sense, the proposal by some lawmakers to revise visa exemption is nothing but an idiotic idea to force the private sectors the responsibility of the disharmony within the bureaucracy.
For more views and opinions in the back number of "GFJ Commentary," the latest of which are as follows, please refer to: http://www.gfj.jp/e/commentary.htm
No.83: "A Clear 'No' to Unprepared Immigration Policy"
by NAGASHIMA Akihisa, Member of the House of Representatives / former State Minister of Defense
(February 25, 2019)
No.82: "The Northern Territories Issue Still No Signs of Headway"
by NAKAMURA Jin, former National Paper Writer
(December 25, 2018)
No.81: "What Japan Needs to be Careful of Japan-China Cooperation on BRI"
by MIFUNE Emi, Academic Member, GFJ / Professor, Komazawa University
(October 26, 2018)
No.80: "The Presence of Britain the Maritime Empire and China’s Ambition"
by SUZUKI Yoshikatsu, Journalist / former Editor-in-Chief of “Gaiko” the magazine on diplomacy
(August 28, 2018)
No.79: "Eurasia's Comeback as the Pivot of the World Order: Its Meaning and Significance"
by UYAMA Tomohiko, Academic Member, GFJ / Professor, Hokkaido University
(June 22, 2018)
"GFJ Updates"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"GFJ Updates" introduces to you the latest events, announcements and/or publications of GFJ.
------------- - - - -------------
Publication
------------- - - - -------------
Outline of Discussion of "The Japan - Indo-Pacific Dialogue : Free and Open Indo-Pacific Initiative and Maritime Order"
The Global Forum of Japan (GFJ) organized "The Japan - Indo-Pacific Dialogue : Free and Open Indo-Pacific Initiative and Maritime Order" in Tokyo on January 21, 2019, under the co-sponsorship of The Japan Forum on International Relations (JFIR), Meiji Institute of Global Affairs (MIGA), Meiji Organization for International Collaboration, Pathfinder Foundation, and "Routledge Studies on Think Asia."
The "Dialogue" was open to public, attended by 87 participants in total, among whom lively discussions were held in two sessions, "Toward Establishing the Maritime Order in Asia" and "For the Progress of 'Free and Open Indo- Pacific Initiative'."
Outline of the discussion of the "Dialogue" can be viewed at the following link:
[Outline of Discussion]
http://www.gfj.jp/e/dialogue/20190121_roe.pdf
Please send your comments and/or questions to:
gfj@gfj.jp
To customize your subscription, or unsubscribe, please refer to:
http://www.gfj.jp/e/e-letter.htm
Officer in Charge: TAKEDA Yuki
The Global Forum of Japan
2-17-12-1301, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052
JAPAN
Tel: +81-3-3584-2193
Fax: +81-3-3505-4406